In an era of rapid technological disruption, organizations must increasingly balance the exploitation of existing capabilities with the exploration of innovative business models and technologies, a duality known as ambidexterity. While prior research has largely focused on ambidexterity at the organizational and individual levels, its operationalization at the team level, particularly within project contexts, remains underexplored. 

Our recently published study addresses this gap by designing and evaluating a decision-support tool that enables structured, ambidexterity-informed staffing of project teams. The tool supports the scoping of business transformation projects, assesses the required balance between exploration and exploitation across different phases, and recommends team compositions aligned with these needs. Following a Design Science Research approach, the artifact was iteratively developed and refined through expert interviews, practitioner workshops, and a scholarly focus group. Additionally, we derive three design principles to guide the effective staffing of ambidextrous project teams and to support the development of information systems in ambidextrous contexts. 

Our study advances ambidexterity research by identifying micro-mechanisms and phase-contingent requirements, linking these to concrete skill profiles through validated measurement, and demonstrating how organizations can embed evidence-based ambidextrous staffing into existing processes.

I am happy that our paper "Balancing Exploration and Exploitation—Designing a Staffing Tool to Leverage Ambidextrous Team Compositionshas" has been accepted for publication in the Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research and is now availabe online (open access).

The inter-organizational processes in procurement remain burdened by media discontinuity, inefficiencies, and a lack of trust among trading partners. Blockchain-based information systems are frequently proposed as a remedy because they enable shared, tamper-evident records. However, existing instantiations rarely scale beyond small consortia because they fail to address the extended blockchain trilemma, which requires simultaneously achieving decentralization, scalability, security, and strict privacy requirements for sensitive commercial information.

In contrast to prior blockchain procurement prototypes that manage the extended blockchain trilemma primarily through permissioned architectures, our recent study investigates how a blockchain-based information system can be designed to reconcile the trade-offs inherent in the extended trilemma, achieving a viable balance through architectural allocation and cryptographic enforcement. Following the design-science research paradigm, an empirically validated problem statement is synthesized from a structured literature review and expert interviews. Five design objectives are derived, evaluated, and used to guide a prototype design, which is then iteratively refined and evaluated through quantitative and formative assessments and sixteen semi-structured expert interviews.

Reflection on the build–evaluate cycles yields two design principles: (1) Balancing decentralization, scalability, and security by using a public chain as a trust anchor, a Layer 2 for scaling, and decentralized communication between layers. (2) Maintaining that balance when privacy is required by integrating efficient, resilient cryptography and minimizing control points. These principles extend existing procurement research, linking business requirements to infrastructural choices, providing a transferable foundation for scholars and practitioners aiming to deploy secure, scalable, and privacy-preserving blockchain solutions in inter-organizational contexts.

I am happy that our paper "Designing a blockchain-based information system for procurement processes—Balancing decentralization, scalability, and security while maintaining privacy" has been accepted for publication in Information Systems and is now availabe online (open access).